Hello! It’s been a
while. Big thanks to all of you who have
reached out. I didn’t realize I had so
many followers! As I’ve read your
e-mails, I’ve been thrilled to learn that so many of you are interested in Dr.
Gonzalez’s work. I always thought that I
would be happy if my little blog impacted even one person but it appears that
there are quite a lot of you who are interested in taking control of your
health. People from all over the world are
questioning the conventional model and thinking twice. I love it.
It is my pleasure and honor to serve you, so please keep the questions
coming.
A lot has happened since I last wrote. If you’re wondering how I’m doing, then the
short answer is “terrific”. I’m still on
the Gonzalez protocol, eating healthy foods (including fatty red meats like grass-
fed burgers and organic bacon five times a week), declining all drugs, and
watching my cancer melt away each month.
I’m still tired and I have some eczema on my hands that is extremely
irritating, but my cancer is decreasing and I’m getting stronger every day, so
I’m pretty happy. It has been a long
journey and I still have a long way to go but I can finally see that there is a
light at the end of the tunnel.
Here’s the long answer to what I’ve been up to…
The spring and summer brought a unique challenge with my
oldest daughter. She didn’t want to have
much to do with me. If I tried to touch
or hug her, she pulled away. If my
husband was anywhere near, she would cling to him as if I didn’t exist.
Now, I’ll be the first to admit that my life is not exactly
balanced these days….my world pretty much revolves around my therapy and my family. So, when my seven year old expressed such
strong animosity towards me, I didn’t take it well. Certainly, I expect this type of behavior to
occur when she transitions to adolescence but I was really bothered to see this
from my sweet, little seven year-old.
Once my husband realized that this was really upsetting me, he asked
Madelyn about it and she explained that “she didn’t want to be too close to
Mommy because she didn’t want to catch cancer”.
Well, I breathed a big sigh of relief when I heard her
explanation because I then knew that her hostility was based on a misunderstanding. Once we
explained that she can’t catch Mommy’s cancer, my little girl returned. She began
sitting in my lap, holding my hand and was generally happy to be around me
again. Whew.
The last couple summers, I had babysitters to help with the
girls, with juicing, etc. Because I was
on the Gerson Therapy, I was doing enemas all day long (four or five a day) and
my time with my daughters was limited.
So, this first summer on the Gonzalez Therapy was really about
re-connecting. I didn’t hire any help
and that made me really happy. I’m a do-it-myself,
hands-on kind of gal and I generally love spending time with my daughters. We had a great summer together.
As the season progressed, my energy rose and fell. In July, I had a few weeks when I felt fantastic. Then,
in August, due to an event unrelated to my cancer, I lost a lot of blood and my
energy plummeted. Unfortunately, I
didn’t rebound from that very quickly.
In September, Dr. Gonzalez called me and said that my
disease was progressing and he suggested that I consider taking a small amount
of conventional medicine to stabilize things.
He said it’s very rare that his patients ever need conventional drugs
but he didn’t want my disease to continue progressing. So, we agreed that I’d head into the local
cancer hospital and see what the oncologist recommended for the least toxic way
to stabilize the disease. Dr. Gonzalez
and his colleague had analyzed my hair
sample results and felt strongly that I was on the right protocol but that stress
was the culprit behind the increase in my disease (Note to all: stress matters. Make an effort to minimize it.). He asked if I was following the program and
if I had experienced any unusual challenges.
As a matter of fact, we had recently experienced some extremely stressful
events….things I won’t divulge here. So,
once again, it appeared that stress was hijacking my health.
The good and most
important news is that Dr. Gonzalez said that he still felt very good about my
long term prognosis. We’d use a
small amount of conventional drugs for a short time to get me over this hump
but long term I’d still be okay.
When Dr. Gonzalez tells me I’ll be okay long term, I don’t
take it lightly. I believe he is
optimistic but I don’t think he’d offer false hope. I’m sharing this because I’ve heard so many
stories about conventional oncologists offering treatments that never have any
chance of working. Maybe the conventional doctors want to be optimistic – I
don’t know - but we patients need to know the truth.
So, I headed into Boston to see the oncologist. Within twenty minutes I felt myself being
sucked into the cancer industry. They
wanted me to return the next week to see a hematologist and to have full body
skeletal x-rays. In addition, they
agreed to only prescribe two drugs but encouraged me to take six. They also encouraged me to participate in a
clinical trial (I found this surprising since I’ve told them that I don’t want
to be part of an experiment). This
appointment which included a blood draw and a 25 minute meeting with the
oncologist cost $3,000 ($1,000 out of pocket).
A one month supply of the two drugs, which includes a total of 24 pills,
costs $8,400.
Now I know how they funded that brand new building, complete
with floor to ceiling windows, rocking chairs, and a pianist. While I waited, I had the opportunity to use
an Ipad and I could take a library book or magazine home with me, free of
charge. I guess that once you’re in the
myeloma ward, they know you’re a patient for life.
At any rate, when I walked into the waiting room and saw the
sea of surgical masks and wheel chairs, I felt a little better than I had
during past visits. I knew that this
would not be my future - I was only there for a temporary fix.
During my appointment, I learned that the myeloma drugs are
so damaging that it is normal for patients’ red and white blood cell counts to
be out of range. As a result, myeloma patients
on conventional therapy are chronically anemic.
I guess I find it surprising that these drugs are so widely accepted and
celebrated. I’ve been anemic for a long
time now and I don’t feel it’s a good way to live. My brain doesn’t get enough oxygen and it
affects my mood and ability to think clearly, not to mention it makes me tired.
I’m hopeful that my anemia is temporary.
I had a conversation with a nurse practitioner about cancer
and the great progress that is being made.
This particular NP worked in breast cancer and was excited about the
fact that some of her patients were using conventional therapies that were
killing off the breast cancer. She
explained that these patients were typically dying a few years later of other
causes, often heart disease.
I feel I should point out that I really like this NP. I sense that she cares about her patients
and that she genuinely believes the industry is doing good things. But I had to scratch my head at her
enthusiasm. If a patient takes chemo and radiation to
reduce the risk of recurrence of breast cancer, and that treatment damages the
heart and lungs so that the patient dies of heart disease a few years later, is
this “great progress”? It kind of
reminds me of that pass the hot potato game we played when we were kids.
During this time, I was grateful to have Dr. Gonzalez as a
resource. I was pretty sure I didn’t
need the full six drug chemo cocktail that the oncologist recommended but I didn’t
know how to discern exactly what was and wasn’t critical. In the end, Dr. Gonzalez said that I didn’t
need the appointment with the hematologist or the full body skeletal
survey.
The drug that I was
going to take is called Revlimid. Years
ago, its’ cousin drug, Thalidomide, had been administered to pregnant women
without being tested. As a result, the pregnant
women taking the drug bore children without limbs and the maker of Thalidomide
lost millions in law suits. (This is eerily similar to what’s happening with
vaccinations. Our children are the
guinea pigs for much of what is being administered). Because Revlimid has a biochemical make-up
that is similar to Thalidomide, I was required to have two pregnancy tests
prior to taking the drug. In addition, I
would be required to have weekly pregnancy tests once I started. Under no circumstances will Revlimid be
administered to pregnant women.
So, I headed off to the lab to have my pregnancy test. Though I wasn’t due to have my blood drawn
for another week, I asked the nurse to draw it anyway. I was hopeful that my myeloma numbers would
hold steady and show signs that things were leveling off. Then, maybe Dr. Gonzalez would tell me that I
didn’t have to take the drugs. I figured
it was a long shot but worth a try.
So, the next evening I received a call from Dr. Gonzalez
with my results. The first question he
asked is if I had begun taking the drug.
I explained that I had not begun taking it because I didn’t have it yet
and then he told me that I had “crested”.
Um, okay – what’s that? He explained that when patients heal on his
protocol, it is normal for them to get worse before they get better. In his blood cancer patients (like yours
truly), he typically sees a patient worsen and then have a dramatic improvement
in blood work. This is all part of the
normal, natural healing process. He
shared the story of a leukemia patient whose white blood cells dropped 100,000
points in a month and a myeloma patient whose IGA dropped several thousand. He said
that all of my numbers improved and that my IGA dropped 2,000 points. My IGA is now the lowest it has been in about
three years (this is very, very good news and indicates that my disease is
dying off). He said
that, given these improvements, there’s no need for me to take any drugs.
Dr. Gonzalez explained that when he saw my blood work trending
in the wrong direction, he suspected that I was cresting and would be fine, but
he had no way to know for sure and he thought I should take the drugs and play
it safe. He’s conservative and I like
that.
I’m glad to be able to share this experience. Many of you are reading this blog because
you’re interested in Dr. Gonzalez’s work and, although it’s rare that his
patients need to use conventional medication, it’s good to know that he will
use drugs when necessary. He’s not hung up on dogma or ego – he’s
focused and committed to getting his patients well and he’ll recommend
whatever it takes to make that happen.
At least that’s my impression and experience.
So, in the end, I didn’t need to take any medicine after all. I’ve spent three years detoxifying, so
the thought of gunking up my body with poisons is not exactly appealing.
A couple weeks ago, I had my appointment for my annual (13
month) check-up with Dr. Gonzalez. Overall, my results were terrific. Here are the highlights from my hair sample
analysis:
1.
CT Mass – cancer tumor mass - measures the
amount of cancer in my body. Normal is
10 or below. A year ago I was at 27 and
now I’m at 17. I have a much less
serious amount of disease. The average
patient improves about 6 points in a year so, although my results have jumped
around a lot, I did improve 10 points in 13 months. Dr. Gonzalez says that 15 is a “safe” amount
of cancer and I am really close to that goal.
2.
TBF – total body function – measures how well my
body is functioning overall. Normal is
90 or above. A year ago, I was at 74 and
now I’m at 84. I am thrilled about this.
3. DNA
–measures the health of my DNA. Normal
is 10 or below. A year ago I was at 18
and now I’m at 15. Dr. Gonzalez says
that as long as I have DNA damage I’m at risk for cancer, so I’m happy to see
my DNA repairing and re-building. The
good news here is that DNA damage is reversible. Note to all: your DNA is not your destiny.
4.
Toxicity – measures the amount of environmental
toxins trapped in my cells. Normal is 10
or below. A year ago I was at 13 and now
I’m at 10 for the second month in a row.
Dr. Gonzalez says that a score of 10 is difficult to maintain and that
the number is based on the environment.
What I find most interesting is that after doing the Gerson Therapy for
two years, which involved 12 glasses of vegetable juice a day and 4 or 5 coffee
enemas a day, I was at a toxicity level of 13.
After two years of so many juices and enemas and an all organic fruit and vegetable diet, I really didn’t think
I could get any cleaner. On my current
therapy, I do fewer enemas and drink much less juice. I also do some other things to detoxify that
are much easier than what I did on my first therapy. Yet, my toxicity level has decreased significantly. I’m glad I was
wrong.
5.
For the first time, all of my digestive organs and
glands, including my parotid, liver, stomach, gall bladder, small intestine and
colon are all in the normal range. Yay! Many alternative doctors believe that cancer
and all diseases begin in the gut and Dr. Gonzalez is no exception. If you’re body can’t break down food, absorb
the nutrients, and filter out the waste, then you’re setting the stage for
disease. Finally, my digestive system is
working the way it should. It’s nice to know
that my body is able to process all the healthy food I am consuming.
6.
I had about a dozen improvements overall. Three
numbers moved in the wrong direction and they were the ones affected by stress:
systemic arteries, adrenal cortex and
hypothalamus. Nothing to worry
about.
Throughout these challenges, I’ve continued
to pray for the patience, perseverance and discernment necessary to heal. So far, it’s been tough but I feel I’m
getting what I need. Thanks and big hugs
to all of you who have kept me in your prayers.
It’s working and I couldn’t do it without you!
Last, for any of you who are reading this
and thinking that this all sounds interesting but you want some studies….some proof. I understand where you’re coming from because
there was a time when I felt the same way. Actually, I’d still like to see it
happen. However, I’ve come to realize
that clinical studies are funded by pharmaceutical companies and there’s simply
no incentive for one of these companies to spend millions on a study for an
alternative therapy, particularly one that is more effective than the conventional
treatments they are selling. If this
topic interests you, you may want to read Dr. Gonzalez’s recently published
book “What Went Wrong”. It’s a detailed
account of his experience working with the NIH and NCI in a clinical
trial. After reading it, you just might think twice the
next time your doctor or a scientist tells you something was “proven” in a
clinical trial.
I’ll leave you with this: I recently met
with a dermatologist who was quick to point out that alternatives don’t work in
his field and that he prefers to use
things that are PROVEN. Initially, I was
annoyed with him but then I just felt kind of bad for him. He seemed so threatened that I was
successfully using an alternative cancer therapy. I’m thinking “why can’t we all just work
together?”. I promptly left his office
and went to Whole Foods to purchase a topical gel that dried up my impetigo in
about four days.
Thanks for reading and I hope you have a
beautiful day.